"Our bodies and minds are made for social life, and we become hopelessly depressed in its absence."
Five years ago, in the heart of COVID, I found myself touching strangers. Casually on a jacketed arm to pass or thank them for tiny kindnesses. Weird behavior on regular days, downright anti-social during COVID (although I was always fully masked, tested, inoculated, and avoided exhaling close to anyone).
And yet, it made me feel better. Brighter. A slight moment of contact in a world of terminal boundaries. "Our bodies and minds are made for social life," argues Dutch biologist/primatologist Frans de Waal (born October 29, 1948) "And we become hopelessly depressed in its absence."
![Drawing of murmuration by artist Ann Pease-xs. 1 of 3](http://cdn.sitetheory.io/nest001/site/623/57845/A-Pease-murmuration-3-scaled-xs.jpg)
I also used to catch people's eyes. I smile - my eyes, ears, and forehead doing most of the work due to facemasks.
A laugh is golden. A shared laugh is more than a moving smile; it activates the belly, the hands, and the legs. Once begun, the body unwinds into laughter. I shared a lot of laughs with strangers during COVID. Did you? De Waal explains this innate connectedness of humor:
Philosophers have been exasperated by the problem of why one of humanity's finest achievements, its sense of humor, is expressed with the sort of crude abandonment associated with animals. There can be no doubt that laughter is inborn. The expression is a human universal, one that we share with our closest relatives, the apes.
In The Age of Empathy: Nature's Lessons for a Kinder Society, author de Waal states that laughter, like many social functions, is an inborn biological feature.
Our bodies and minds are made for social life, and we become hopelessly depressed in its absence. This is why, next to death, solitary confinement is our worst punishment. Bonding is so good for us that the most reliable way to extend one's life expectancy is to marry and stay married. The flip side is the risk we run after losing a partner. The death of a spouse often leads to despair and a reduced will to live that explains car accidents, alcohol abuse, heart disease, and cancers that take the lives of those left behind. Mortality remains elevated for half a year following a spouse's death.
![Drawing of murmuration by artist Ann Pease-xs. 2 of 3](http://cdn.sitetheory.io/nest001/site/623/57846/A-Pease-murmuration-1-scaled-xs.jpg)
While I consider empathy and kindness, I remember George Saunders' failures of kindness and Nurse Christie Watson on the language of kindness and the indefatigable acts that make us human.
But most of all, I return to illustrator Maira Kalman, who wrote, "If you are ever bored or blue, stand on the street corner for half an hour..."
![Illustration by Maira Kalman from Kalman's book](http://cdn.sitetheory.io/nest001/site/623/57551/IMG_7622-scaled-xs.jpg)
Kalman obliges to something physical. "I imitate their step..." she writes (and more to the point, illustrates). This physical bond is what Waal calls "embodied cognition."
The field of “embodied" cognition is still very much in its infancy but has profound implications for how we look at human relations. We involuntarily enter the bodies of those around us so that their movements and emotions echo within us as if they're our own. This allows us, or other primates, to re-create what we have seen others do. Body-mapping is hidden chiefly and unconscious, but sometimes it "slips out,” such as when parents make chewing mouth movements while spoon-feeding their baby. They can't help but act the way they feel their baby ought to. Similarly, parents watching a singing performance of their child often get completely into it, mouthing every word. I myself still remember as a boy standing on the sidelines of soccer games and involuntarily making kicking or jumping moves each time someone I was cheering forgot the ball. The same can be seen in animals.
The most substantial feelings of empathy carry a physical force, unseen grappling hooks. I noticed when my newly-walking toddler fell forward on the ground that I lurched instinctively in some connected imitation. Her fall became my fall.
Imitation, according to de Waal, has a unique meaning.
Not only do we mimic those with whom we identify, but mimicry in turn strengthens the bond. Human mothers and children play games of clapping hands either against each other or together in the same rhythm. These are games of synchronization. And what do lovers do when they first meet? They stroll long distances side by side, eat together, laugh together, dance together. Being in sync has a bonding effect. Think about dancing. Partners complement each other's moves, anticipate them, or guide each other through their own movements. Dancing screams “We're in synchrony!" which is the way animals have been bonding for millions of years.
The act of replicating another, mimicry, is much more than merely a repetition of action; it is a form of social observation and, thus, social bonding.
When I see synchrony and mimicry - whether it concerns yawning, laughing, dancing, or aping—I see social connection and bonding. I see an old herd instinct that has been taken up a notch. It goes beyond the tendency of a mass of individuals galloping in the same direction, crossing the river at the same time. The new level requires that one pay better attention to what others do and absorb how they do it. For example, I knew an old monkey matriarch with a curious drinking style. Instead of the typical slurping with her lips from the surface, she'd dip her entire underarm in the water, and then lick the hair on her arm. Her children started doing the same, and then her grandchildren. The entire family was easy to recognize.
![](https://cdn.sitetheory.io/nest001/site/623/314466/A%20Pease%20murmuration%202-xs.jpg?v=1698924882)
Our connectedness to others is seen and felt in our physical consolation within and among species.
Comforting body contact is art of our mammalian biology, going back to maternal nursing, holding and carrying, which is why we both seek and give it under stressful circumstances. People touch and hug at funerals, in hospitals around sick or injured loved ones, during wars and earthquakes, and following defeat in sports.
I think of Rebecca Solnit's study of human intervention and compassion in the face of disaster and the very memorable last scene of John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath, the novel in which he explored his phalanx theories of unity and brotherhood in the face of extreme poverty. Steinbeck's towering novel ended with one of the main characters, a young girl who had just had a stillborn child, giving her unused, full breast to a starving man. (John Ford's film version did not include this scene, although it is otherwise exceptional).
And then there is this gorgeous rendition of the importance of touch, from poet David Whyte's reclamation of words:
Whether we touch only what we see or the mystery of what lies beneath the veil of what we see, we are made for unending meeting and exchange, while having to hold a coherent mind and body, physically or imaginatively, which in turn can be found and touched itself. We are something for the world to run up against and rub up against: through the trials of love, through pain, through happiness, through our simple everyday movement through the world.
From David Whyte's Consolations
For more on the biological kinship unifies us, listen to de Waal's engaging TED Talk on our hard-wired reciprocity, or take a turn in James Baldwin's dignified plea for social integration, Erich Fromm on love as the antidote to human separateness, de Waal's additional work on the limits of knowledge in our understanding of animals, and my pieces on the meaning and importance of touch and an implacable call for kindness.
"We are made for cooperation," argued Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius more than 2000 years ago in his gathered thoughts Meditations. It has always been thus.